DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Opel Omega vs 1999 Holden Vectra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

65.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeHolden
OmegaModelVectra
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
228 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2498 ccEngine displacement2498 cc
170 HPPower170 HP
226 NmTorque230 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank60 lt
15,3 ltUrban consumption—
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,9 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4898 mmLength4477 mm
1785 mmWidth1707 mm
1455 mmHeight1428 mm
1530 KgWeight1370 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Opel Omega and 1999 Holden Vectra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…