1996 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.5i V6 (170 Hp) 1996Overall Score64.5/100
1996 Opel Omega vs 1996 Buick Skylark Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Buick
Skylark
Buick Skylark 2.3 i 16V (152 Hp) 1996Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Buick Skylark
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationBuick Skylark
OpelMakeBuick
OmegaModelSkylark
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationBuick Skylark
9,5 s0–100 km/h—
228 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2498 ccEngine displacement2260 cc
170 HPPower152 HP
226 NmTorque196 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationBuick Skylark
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank58 lt
15,3 ltUrban consumption—
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,9 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationBuick Skylark
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears3
205/65R 15Tyre size195/70 R14 S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationBuick Skylark
4785 mmLength4805 mm
1785 mmWidth1746 mm
1450 mmHeight1360 mm
1530 KgWeight1337 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2627 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Opel Omega and 1996 Buick Skylark approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Buick Skylark leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…