DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Opel Omega vs 2003 Marcos TS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Marcos TS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel OmegaSpecificationMarcos TS
OpelMakeMarcos
OmegaModelTS
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

Opel OmegaSpecificationMarcos TS
11,0 s0–100 km/h7,0 s
206 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2495 cc
150 HPPower180 HP
300 NmTorque220 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Opel OmegaSpecificationMarcos TS
DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank48 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption15 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Opel OmegaSpecificationMarcos TS
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size215/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Opel OmegaSpecificationMarcos TS
4898 mmLength4005 mm
1775 mmWidth1680 mm
1450 mmHeight1150 mm
1610 KgWeight1075 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2225 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Opel Omega and 2003 Marcos TS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Marcos TS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…