DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Opel Omega vs 2003 Kia Carnival Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Carnival

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeKia
OmegaModelCarnival
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h—
206 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
300 NmTorque224 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption14,1 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption10,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size215/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4898 mmLength4925 mm
1775 mmWidth1900 mm
1450 mmHeight1730 mm
1610 KgWeight1988 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2905 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Opel Omega and 2003 Kia Carnival approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Carnival leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…