DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Opel Omega vs 2003 Hyundai XG Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Hyundai XG

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeHyundai
OmegaModelXG
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h9,1 s
206 km/hTop speed213 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2494 cc
150 HPPower163 HP
300 NmTorque230 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption14,0 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,0 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption10,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4898 mmLength4865 mm
1775 mmWidth1825 mm
1450 mmHeight1420 mm
1610 KgWeight1640 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Opel Omega and 2003 Hyundai XG approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Hyundai XG leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…