DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Opel Omega vs 2002 Toyota Granvia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Granvia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeToyota
OmegaModelGranvia
2002Model year2002
SedanBody type—
5Seats—
4Doors—

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h—
206 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2694 cc
150 HPPower152 HP
300 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank0 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
205/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4898 mmLength—
1775 mmWidth—
1450 mmHeight—
1610 KgWeight—
2730 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Opel Omega and 2002 Toyota Granvia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Granvia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…