DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Opel Omega vs 2002 Opel Vectra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Vectra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeOpel
OmegaModelVectra
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
206 km/hTop speed222 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2498 cc
150 HPPower170 HP
300 NmTorque230 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption14,3 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4898 mmLength4490 mm
1775 mmWidth1707 mm
1450 mmHeight1490 mm
1610 KgWeight1397 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2637 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Opel Omega and 2002 Opel Vectra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Vectra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…