DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Opel Omega vs 2002 Kia Magentis Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Magentis

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeKia
OmegaModelMagentis
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
206 km/hTop speed214 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2493 cc
150 HPPower169 HP
300 NmTorque230 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption13,6 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4898 mmLength4730 mm
1775 mmWidth1820 mm
1450 mmHeight1410 mm
1610 KgWeight1487 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Opel Omega and 2002 Kia Magentis approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Magentis leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…