2002 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.5 V6 TDI (150 Hp) 2002Overall Score64.75/100
2002 Opel Omega vs 2002 Ford Mondeo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 2.5 (170 Hp) 2002Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Ford Mondeo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Mondeo
OpelMakeFord
OmegaModelMondeo
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Mondeo
11,0 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
206 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2495 cc
150 HPPower170 HP
300 NmTorque220 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Mondeo
DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank58 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption14,2 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Mondeo
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Mondeo
4898 mmLength4731 mm
1775 mmWidth1812 mm
1450 mmHeight1429 mm
1610 KgWeight1468 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2754 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Opel Omega and 2002 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…