2002 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.5 V6 TDI (150 Hp) 2002Overall Score64.75/100
2002 Opel Omega vs 2002 Ford Contour Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Ford
Contour
Ford Contour 2.5i V6 24V LX (170 Hp) 2002Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Ford Contour
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Contour
OpelMakeFord
OmegaModelContour
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Contour
11,0 s0–100 km/h—
206 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2539 cc
150 HPPower170 HP
300 NmTorque224 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Contour
DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,6 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Contour
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14 S
YesABS—
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Contour
4898 mmLength4671 mm
1775 mmWidth1755 mm
1450 mmHeight1384 mm
1610 KgWeight1257 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2704 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Opel Omega and 2002 Ford Contour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…