DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Opel Omega vs 1996 Chrysler Sebring Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Sebring

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

58.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeChrysler
OmegaModelSebring
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
200 km/hTop speed177 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2429 cc
131 HPPower152 HP
250 NmTorque226 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4785 mmLength4902 mm
1785 mmWidth1757 mm
1450 mmHeight1392 mm
1605 KgWeight1515 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2692 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Opel Omega and 1996 Chrysler Sebring approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Sebring leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…