DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Opel Omega vs 1994 Volvo 940 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 940

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel OmegaSpecificationVolvo 940
OpelMakeVolvo
OmegaModel940
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Opel OmegaSpecificationVolvo 940
10,8 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
200 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2410 ccEngine displacement2383 cc
125 HPPower122 HP
195 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Opel OmegaSpecificationVolvo 940
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption—
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,3 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel OmegaSpecificationVolvo 940
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Opel OmegaSpecificationVolvo 940
4740 mmLength4871 mm
1760 mmWidth1750 mm
1445 mmHeight1411 mm
1330 KgWeight1440 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Opel Omega and 1994 Volvo 940 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 940 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…