DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Opel Omega vs 1995 Chrysler Voyager Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Voyager

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeChrysler
OmegaModelVoyager
1994Model year1995
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors4

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h13,8 s
200 km/hTop speed166 km/h
2410 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
125 HPPower116 HP
195 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank76 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption11 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size215/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4733 mm
1760 mmWidth1950 mm
1445 mmHeight1740 mm
1330 KgWeight1880 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2878 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Opel Omega and 1995 Chrysler Voyager approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Voyager leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…