DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1988 Opel Omega vs 1987 Toyota 4runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

55.5–54.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeToyota
OmegaModel4runner
1988Model year1987
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2410 ccEngine displacement2366 cc
125 HPPower97 HP
195 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank65 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption—
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4435 mm
1760 mmWidth1689 mm
1445 mmHeight1679 mm
1330 KgWeight—
2730 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1988 Opel Omega and 1987 Toyota 4runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…