1994 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.3 TD Interc. (100 Hp) 1994Overall Score56.25/100
1994 Opel Omega vs 1994 Mazda MX-6 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1994 • Mazda
MX-6
Mazda MX-6 2.0 i 16V (115 Hp) 1994Overall Score55.5/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda MX-6
OpelMakeMazda
OmegaModelMX-6
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
4Doors2
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda MX-6
14,0 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
184 km/hTop speed204 km/h
2260 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
100 HPPower115 HP
215 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda MX-6
DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,7 ltAverage consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda MX-6
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R15Tyre size195/65 R14 88 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda MX-6
4740 mmLength4615 mm
1760 mmWidth1750 mm
1445 mmHeight1310 mm
1375 KgWeight1120 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1994 Opel Omega and 1994 Mazda MX-6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…