1992 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.3 TD Interc. (100 Hp) 1992Overall Score56.25/100
1992 Opel Omega vs 1992 Ford Sierra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Ford
Sierra
Ford Sierra 2.0i (101 Hp) 1992Overall Score55.5/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Sierra
OpelMakeFord
OmegaModelSierra
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Sierra
14,0 s0–100 km/h—
184 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2260 ccEngine displacement1993 cc
100 HPPower101 HP
215 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Sierra
DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Sierra
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Sierra
4740 mmLength4425 mm
1760 mmWidth1694 mm
1445 mmHeight1407 mm
1375 KgWeight—
2730 mmWheelbase2608 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Opel Omega and 1992 Ford Sierra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…