DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1991 Opel Omega vs 1991 Toyota Chaser Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeToyota
OmegaModelChaser
1991Model year1991
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h—
184 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2260 ccEngine displacement1838 cc
100 HPPower105 HP
215 NmTorque149 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank65 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4690 mm
1760 mmWidth1695 mm
1445 mmHeight1375 mm
1375 KgWeight—
2730 mmWheelbase2680 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1991 Opel Omega and 1991 Toyota Chaser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…