DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1986 Opel Omega vs 1986 Opel Ascona Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Ascona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeOpel
OmegaModelAscona
1986Model year1986
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

14,5 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
176 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2260 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
90 HPPower100 HP
190 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank61 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4366 mm
1760 mmWidth1668 mm
1445 mmHeight1395 mm
1304 KgWeight1065 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2574 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1986 Opel Omega and 1986 Opel Ascona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Ascona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…