DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Opel Omega vs 1996 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

40.25–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel OmegaSpecificationGAZ 31
OpelMakeGAZ
OmegaModel31
1992Model year1996
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Opel OmegaSpecificationGAZ 31
20,5 s0–100 km/h24,0 s
163 km/hTop speed135 km/h
2260 ccEngine displacement2445 cc
73 HPPower81 HP
138 NmTorque167 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel OmegaSpecificationGAZ 31
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,0 ltAverage consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel OmegaSpecificationGAZ 31
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Opel OmegaSpecificationGAZ 31
4740 mmLength4885 mm
1760 mmWidth1800 mm
1445 mmHeight1576 mm
1355 KgWeight1540 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Opel Omega and 1996 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…