DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Opel Omega vs 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Cavalier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeChevrolet
OmegaModelCavalier
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors2

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
210 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
144 HPPower141 HP
205 NmTorque203 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank53 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4898 mmLength4580 mm
1776 mmWidth1712 mm
1455 mmHeight1351 mm
1535 KgWeight1215 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2645 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Opel Omega and 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Cavalier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…