DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Opel Omega vs 1994 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda 323
OpelMakeMazda
OmegaModel323
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda 323
—0–100 km/h8,2 s
190 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
99 HPPower103 HP
170 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank55 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda 323
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
195/65 R15Tyre size185/60 R14

Dimensions

Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda 323
4740 mmLength4260 mm
1760 mmWidth1680 mm
1445 mmHeight1340 mm
1235 KgWeight1120 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Opel Omega and 1994 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…