DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Opel Omega vs 1992 Opel Astra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Astra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeOpel
OmegaModelAstra
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
190 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
99 HPPower115 HP
170 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank52 lt
—Average consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/60 R14 82S

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4051 mm
1760 mmWidth1688 mm
1445 mmHeight1410 mm
1235 KgWeight1040/1060 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2517 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Opel Omega and 1992 Opel Astra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Astra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…