DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Opel Omega vs 1990 Saturn SL Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saturn SL

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel OmegaSpecificationSaturn SL
OpelMakeSaturn
OmegaModelSL
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Opel OmegaSpecificationSaturn SL
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1901 cc
99 HPPower100 HP
170 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel OmegaSpecificationSaturn SL
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank49 lt
—Average consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel OmegaSpecificationSaturn SL
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size175/70 R14 S
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Opel OmegaSpecificationSaturn SL
4740 mmLength4478 mm
1760 mmWidth1718 mm
1445 mmHeight1334 mm
1235 KgWeight1054 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2601 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Opel Omega and 1990 Saturn SL approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saturn SL leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…