1990 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.0i CAT (99 Hp) 1990Overall Score58.25/100
1990 Opel Omega vs 1990 Nissan Laurel Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Nissan
Laurel
Nissan Laurel 2.0 i (125 Hp) 1990Overall Score58.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Laurel
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationNissan Laurel
OpelMakeNissan
OmegaModelLaurel
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationNissan Laurel
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
99 HPPower125 HP
170 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationNissan Laurel
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Average consumption7,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationNissan Laurel
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationNissan Laurel
4740 mmLength4710 mm
1760 mmWidth1720 mm
1445 mmHeight1380 mm
1235 KgWeight1330 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2720 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Opel Omega and 1990 Nissan Laurel approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Laurel leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…