DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Opel Omega vs 1990 Nissan Largo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Largo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeNissan
OmegaModelLargo
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1974 cc
99 HPPower100 HP
170 NmTorque177 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption11,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,67 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4610 mm
1760 mmWidth1745 mm
1445 mmHeight1905 mm
1235 KgWeight1620 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2735 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Opel Omega and 1990 Nissan Largo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Largo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…