1993 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.0i CAT (100 Hp) 1993Overall Score62.25/100
1993 Opel Omega vs 1993 Citroen XM Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1993 • Citroen
XM
Citroen XM 2.0 i TCT (145 Hp) 1993Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationCitroen XM
OpelMakeCitroen
OmegaModelXM
1993Model year1993
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationCitroen XM
—0–100 km/h9,8 s
180 km/hTop speed212 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
100 HPPower145 HP
158 NmTorque226 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationCitroen XM
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption12,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,1 lt
—Average consumption8,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationCitroen XM
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/60 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationCitroen XM
4770 mmLength4710 mm
1760 mmWidth1795 mm
1480 mmHeight1385 mm
1265 KgWeight1400 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1993 Opel Omega and 1993 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…