DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Opel Omega vs 1994 Lancia Dedra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Dedra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeLancia
OmegaModelDedra
1994Model year1994
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
187 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1756 cc
99 HPPower101 HP
170 NmTorque142 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption—
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4770 mmLength4343 mm
1760 mmWidth1700 mm
1480 mmHeight1430 mm
1265 KgWeight1215 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Opel Omega and 1994 Lancia Dedra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Dedra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…