DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1993 Opel Omega vs 1993 Opel Frontera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

49.25–48.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeOpel
OmegaModelFrontera
1993Model year1993
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h19,3 s
187 km/hTop speed147 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2260 cc
99 HPPower100 HP
170 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption10,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65R15Tyre size235/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4770 mmLength4692 mm
1760 mmWidth1764 mm
1480 mmHeight1753 mm
1265 KgWeight1785 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1993 Opel Omega and 1993 Opel Frontera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…