1998 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.0i 16V (136 Hp) 1998Overall Score55.5/100
1998 Opel Omega vs 1997 Opel Omega Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.0i 16V (136 Hp) 1997Overall Score55.5/100
RESULT
Tie
The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score.
55.5–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationOpel Omega
OpelMakeOpel
OmegaModelOmega
1998Model year1997
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationOpel Omega
11,2 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
210 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
136 HPPower136 HP
185 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
12,7 ltUrban consumption12,7 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationOpel Omega
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationOpel Omega
4785 mmLength4785 mm
1785 mmWidth1785 mm
1450 mmHeight1450 mm
1551 KgWeight1551 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Opel Omega and 1997 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score. The better choice therefore depends more heavily on priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance and equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…