1993 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.0i (122 Hp) 1993Overall Score58.5/100
1993 Opel Omega vs 1993 Audi Cabriolet Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1993 • Audi
Cabriolet
Audi Cabriolet 2.0 E (115 Hp) 1993Overall Score58.25/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi Cabriolet
OpelMakeAudi
OmegaModelCabriolet
1993Model year1993
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi Cabriolet
10,0 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
200 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
122 HPPower115 HP
175 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi Cabriolet
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption12,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,8 lt
—Average consumption9,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi Cabriolet
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi Cabriolet
4740 mmLength4366 mm
1760 mmWidth1716 mm
1445 mmHeight1379 mm
1232 KgWeight1350 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2556 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1993 Opel Omega and 1993 Audi Cabriolet approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…