1998 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.0i (116 Hp) 1998Overall Score53.25/100
1998 Opel Omega vs 1998 Honda Sm-x Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Honda
Sm-x
Honda Sm-x 2.0 i 16V (131 Hp) 1998Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationHonda Sm-x
OpelMakeHonda
OmegaModelSm-x
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
4Doors4
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationHonda Sm-x
14,0 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
188 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
116 HPPower131 HP
172 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationHonda Sm-x
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank65 lt
14 ltUrban consumption8,93 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,43 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationHonda Sm-x
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationHonda Sm-x
4785 mmLength3950 mm
1785 mmWidth1695 mm
1450 mmHeight1750 mm
1460 KgWeight1330 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Opel Omega and 1998 Honda Sm-x approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…