DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Opel Omega vs 1994 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi 80
OpelMakeAudi
OmegaModel80
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi 80
14,0 s0–100 km/h14,1 s
188 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
116 HPPower90 HP
172 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank66 lt
14 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
—Average consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi 80
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi 80
4785 mmLength4482 mm
1785 mmWidth1695 mm
1450 mmHeight1406 mm
1460 KgWeight1270 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Opel Omega and 1994 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…