DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Opel Omega vs 1995 Seat Toledo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeSeat
OmegaModelToledo
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
195 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
115 HPPower90 HP
172 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank55 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4785 mmLength4321 mm
1785 mmWidth1662 mm
1450 mmHeight1421 mm
1460 KgWeight1080 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2471 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Opel Omega and 1995 Seat Toledo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…