1995 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.0i (115 Hp) 1995Overall Score53.25/100
1995 Opel Omega vs 1995 Chrysler Neon Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Chrysler
Neon
Chrysler Neon 2.0 i 16V (147 Hp) 1995Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationChrysler Neon
OpelMakeChrysler
OmegaModelNeon
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationChrysler Neon
13,0 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1996 cc
115 HPPower147 HP
172 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationChrysler Neon
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank42 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption—
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationChrysler Neon
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationChrysler Neon
4785 mmLength4364 mm
1785 mmWidth1714 mm
1450 mmHeight1369 mm
1460 KgWeight—
2730 mmWheelbase2642 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Opel Omega and 1995 Chrysler Neon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…