DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Opel Omega vs 2000 Renault Laguna Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeRenault
OmegaModelLaguna
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

15,0 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
186 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
101 HPPower113 HP
205 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank66 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
—Average consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4898 mmLength4508 mm
1776 mmWidth1752 mm
1455 mmHeight1432 mm
1540 KgWeight1255 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Opel Omega and 2000 Renault Laguna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…