2000 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.0 DTI 16V (101 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
2000 Opel Omega vs 2000 Mazda MX-6 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
MX-6
Mazda MX-6 2.0 i 16V (115 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda MX-6
OpelMakeMazda
OmegaModelMX-6
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
4Doors2
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda MX-6
15,0 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
186 km/hTop speed204 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
101 HPPower115 HP
205 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda MX-6
DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption—
5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda MX-6
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R14 88 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda MX-6
4898 mmLength4615 mm
1776 mmWidth1750 mm
1455 mmHeight1310 mm
1540 KgWeight1120 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Opel Omega and 2000 Mazda MX-6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…