DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Opel Omega vs 2000 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi A3
OpelMakeAudi
OmegaModelA3
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi A3
15,0 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
186 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
101 HPPower90 HP
205 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi A3
DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi A3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi A3
4898 mmLength4152 mm
1776 mmWidth1735 mm
1455 mmHeight1427 mm
1540 KgWeight1185 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Opel Omega and 2000 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…