1992 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.0 (100 Hp) 1992Overall Score58.5/100
1992 Opel Omega vs 1992 Mazda Cronos Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Mazda
Cronos
Mazda Cronos 2.0 D (82 Hp) 1992Overall Score58.25/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda Cronos
OpelMakeMazda
OmegaModelCronos
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda Cronos
0 km/hTop speed161 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
100 HPPower82 HP
158 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda Cronos
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R14 89 S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda Cronos
4740 mmLength4695 mm
1760 mmWidth1770 mm
1445 mmHeight1400 mm
—Weight1260 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Opel Omega and 1992 Mazda Cronos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…