1992 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.0 (100 Hp) 1992Overall Score58.5/100
1992 Opel Omega vs 1992 Audi 80 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Audi
80
Audi 80 2.0 E (115 Hp) 1992Overall Score58.25/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi 80
OpelMakeAudi
OmegaModel80
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi 80
—0–100 km/h11,8 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
100 HPPower115 HP
158 NmTorque166 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption11,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6 lt
—Average consumption7,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi 80
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi 80
4740 mmLength4482 mm
1760 mmWidth1695 mm
1445 mmHeight1406 mm
—Weight1230 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2612 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Opel Omega and 1992 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…