DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1991 Opel Omega vs 1991 Hyundai Stellar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeHyundai
OmegaModelStellar
1991Model year1991
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
100 HPPower93 HP
158 NmTorque151 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank54 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/70 SR13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4415 mm
1760 mmWidth1715 mm
1445 mmHeight1370 mm
—Weight1230 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1991 Opel Omega and 1991 Hyundai Stellar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…