DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Opel Omega vs 1991 Seat Toledo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–45.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeSeat
OmegaModelToledo
1990Model year1991
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h16,5 s
183 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
88 HPPower68 HP
143 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,1 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size175/70 R 13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4321 mm
1760 mmWidth1662 mm
1445 mmHeight1424 mm
1215 KgWeight1050 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2471 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Opel Omega and 1991 Seat Toledo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…