2010 • Opel
Movano
Opel Movano 2.3 BiTurbo (170 Hp) 2010Overall Score70.75/100
2010 Opel Movano vs 2010 Mazda CX-7 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Mazda
CX-7
Mazda CX-7 2.3 16V turbo 4 WD 6A/T (238) 2010Overall Score71.5/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-7
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel MovanoSpecificationMazda CX-7
OpelMakeMazda
MovanoModelCX-7
2010Model year2010
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
6/9Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Opel MovanoSpecificationMazda CX-7
—0–100 km/h8,3 s
0 km/hTop speed181 km/h
2298 ccEngine displacement2260 cc
170 HPPower238 HP
350 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel MovanoSpecificationMazda CX-7
DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank69 lt
—Urban consumption15,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,3 lt
—Average consumption11,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel MovanoSpecificationMazda CX-7
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size235/60 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel MovanoSpecificationMazda CX-7
5048 mmLength4675 mm
2070 mmWidth1872 mm
2307 mmHeight1645 mm
—Weight1802 Kg
3182 mmWheelbase2750 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Opel Movano and 2010 Mazda CX-7 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-7 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…