DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Opel Mokka vs 2003 Opel Vectra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Mokka

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 6.75 points.

63.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeOpel
MokkaModelVectra
2012Model year2003
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
195 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1364 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
140 HPPower125 HP
200 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption—
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,3 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
215/55 R18Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4278 mmLength4495 mm
1658 mmWidth1707 mm
1777 mmHeight1425 mm
1490 KgWeight1360 Kg
2555 mmWheelbase2637 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Opel Mokka and 2003 Opel Vectra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Mokka leads the E-Kıyasla score by 6.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…