DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Opel Mokka vs 2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeAlfa Romeo
MokkaModelMiTo
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats4/5
5Doors3

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h8,1 s
191 km/hTop speed209 km/h
1364 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
140 HPPower140 HP
200 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x2DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6 TCT
ATTransmission—
18Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4278 mmLength4063 mm
1777 mmWidth1720 mm
1658 mmHeight1446 mm
1394 kgWeight1170 Kg
356 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2511 mm

Additional Features

Opel MokkaDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Opel Mokka and 2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…