DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Opel Meriva vs 2012 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Meriva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeNissan
MerivaModelAD
2012Model year2012
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
110 HPPower109 HP
280 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank41 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption—
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4288 mmLength4395 mm
1994 mmWidth1695 mm
1615 mmHeight1500 mm
1428 KgWeight—
2644 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Opel Meriva and 2012 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Meriva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…