DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Opel Meriva vs 2002 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Meriva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeOpel
MerivaModelCombo
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,5 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
170 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
87 HPPower75 HP
138 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
53 ltFuel tank52 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4042 mmLength4320 mm
1694 mmWidth1685 mm
1624 mmHeight1800 mm
1350 KgWeight1260 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2751 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Opel Meriva and 2002 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Meriva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…