DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Opel Meriva vs 2003 Toyota Funcargo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Funcargo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeToyota
MerivaModelFuncargo
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

17,8 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
157 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
70 HPPower86 HP
170 NmTorque124 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4042 mmLength3890 mm
1694 mmWidth1690 mm
1624 mmHeight1680 mm
1320 KgWeight1055 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Opel Meriva and 2003 Toyota Funcargo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Funcargo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…