DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Alfa Romeo 147 vs 2006 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 147

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeNissan
147ModelAD
2006Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h—
193 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1769 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
280 NmTorque163 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
185/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4223 mmLength4370 mm
1729 mmWidth1695 mm
1442 mmHeight1475 mm
1290 KgWeight—
2546 mmWheelbase2535 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Alfa Romeo 147 and 2006 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 147 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…