DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Opel Kadett vs 1990 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Kadett

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeCitroen
KadettModelXM
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
195 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
115 HPPower121 HP
170 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption12,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
—Average consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4218 mmLength4710 mm
1658 mmWidth1795 mm
1400 mmHeight1385 mm
985 KgWeight1310 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Opel Kadett and 1990 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Kadett leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…