2003 • Alfa Romeo
147
Alfa Romeo 147 1.9 JTD (115 Hp) 2003Overall Score60.25/100
2003 Alfa Romeo 147 vs 2003 Toyota Celica Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Toyota
Celica
Toyota Celica 1.8 VT-i 16V (143 Hp) 2003Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Alfa Romeo 147
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Alfa Romeo 147SpecificationToyota Celica
Alfa RomeoMakeToyota
147ModelCelica
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
3Doors2
Performance
Alfa Romeo 147SpecificationToyota Celica
9,9 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
191 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1794 cc
115 HPPower143 HP
275 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Alfa Romeo 147SpecificationToyota Celica
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption10,3 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Alfa Romeo 147SpecificationToyota Celica
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
185/65 R 15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Alfa Romeo 147SpecificationToyota Celica
4170 mmLength4335 mm
1729 mmWidth1735 mm
1439 mmHeight1320 mm
1345 KgWeight1070 Kg
2546 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Alfa Romeo 147 and 2003 Toyota Celica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Alfa Romeo 147 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…